U.S Politics
Pelosi in Troubles as Hidden Details On The January 6 Capitol Riot Exposed!!!
Information reaching USA LOADED has it that the recent testimony of former U.S. Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund has shed fresh light on the events leading up to the fateful January 6, 2021, Capitol Building riot.
Sund’s testimony has rekindled a debate concerning Speaker Nancy’s involvement in security decisions for the Capitol.
It emerged that three days prior to the riot, Sund had made a request for National Guard soldiers to assist in securing the Capitol.
However, this request was turned down by U.S. House Sergeant of Arms Paul Irving, citing concerns about optics and the assertion that “the intelligence doesn’t support it.”
Sund’s evident frustration with the denial of troops was palpable during his testimony, as he firmly believed their presence could have had a significant impact on securing the Capitol on that fateful day.
His efforts to obtain approval for National Guard support included meetings with both Irving and Senate Sergeant at Arms Michael, two of the three members of the Capitol Police Board responsible for overseeing such requests.
The disclosure of Sund’s account has raised questions about Speaker Nancy’s involvement in the decision-making process.
According to Sund, Irving had suggested that he reach out to the Pentagon to assess the availability of Guard personnel, showing a willingness to explore alternative solutions.
Sund’s subsequent conversation with Army Gen. William Walker revealed the possibility of reallocating personnel for assistance.
Subcommittee Chairman Representative Barry even questioned whether Irving had informed Michael of Sund’s impending visit, to which Sund testified that Michael acknowledged Irving’s involvement in devising an alternative strategy.
Michael allegedly remarked, “Sund came here looking for the National Guard. We’ve got to come up with another plan. Nancy will never go for it.”
It’s essential to note that while Sund’s revelations provide insight into the events leading up to January 6, they do not offer a complete understanding of Nancy’s role in the decision-making process.
Sund’s testimony, however, has reignited a debate regarding Speaker Nancy’s influence on security decisions for the Capitol.
Sund’s testimony has now lent further credence to this assertion.
Representative Loudermilk has indicated that Paul Irving will be summoned to testify before his subcommittee, presenting an opportunity for additional clarification and a deeper understanding of the decision-making process related to Capitol security on January 6.
This development promises to add more complexity to an already intricate narrative, as questions regarding the events of that day continue to loom large in American politics and public discourse.
-
People4 hours agoA Girl Rushed Out Of McDonald’s Bathroom Crying, Then Her Mom Saw Something Wrong On Her Legs
-
People14 hours agoBabysitter heard noise upstairs, so ‘dad checked the hidden camera and saw a nightmare in his kitchen’!
-
People24 hours agoBabysitter heard noise upstairs, so ‘dad checked the hidden camera and saw a nightmare in his kitchen’!
-
People16 hours agoA mother gave birth to 3 black babies – so the father looked closely and burst into tears
-
People2 hours agoMother poured gasoline into crying 8-year-old son’s mouth and burned him alive ‘after he told his father this’!
-
People3 hours agoThe bus driver picked up the children early in the morning as usual, and the parents found out they were not at school
-
People12 hours agoA little girl claimed to be the new Whitney Houston – seconds later she made all the judges shudder
-
People21 hours agoDoctors were horrified when 5-year-old girl was impregnated; she gave birth 80 years ago and here’s what happened to her baby’!