U.S Politics
Pelosi in Troubles as Hidden Details On The January 6 Capitol Riot Exposed!!!
Information reaching USA LOADED has it that the recent testimony of former U.S. Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund has shed fresh light on the events leading up to the fateful January 6, 2021, Capitol Building riot.
Sund’s testimony has rekindled a debate concerning Speaker Nancy’s involvement in security decisions for the Capitol.
It emerged that three days prior to the riot, Sund had made a request for National Guard soldiers to assist in securing the Capitol.
However, this request was turned down by U.S. House Sergeant of Arms Paul Irving, citing concerns about optics and the assertion that “the intelligence doesn’t support it.”
Sund’s evident frustration with the denial of troops was palpable during his testimony, as he firmly believed their presence could have had a significant impact on securing the Capitol on that fateful day.
His efforts to obtain approval for National Guard support included meetings with both Irving and Senate Sergeant at Arms Michael, two of the three members of the Capitol Police Board responsible for overseeing such requests.
The disclosure of Sund’s account has raised questions about Speaker Nancy’s involvement in the decision-making process.
According to Sund, Irving had suggested that he reach out to the Pentagon to assess the availability of Guard personnel, showing a willingness to explore alternative solutions.
Sund’s subsequent conversation with Army Gen. William Walker revealed the possibility of reallocating personnel for assistance.
Subcommittee Chairman Representative Barry even questioned whether Irving had informed Michael of Sund’s impending visit, to which Sund testified that Michael acknowledged Irving’s involvement in devising an alternative strategy.
Michael allegedly remarked, “Sund came here looking for the National Guard. We’ve got to come up with another plan. Nancy will never go for it.”
It’s essential to note that while Sund’s revelations provide insight into the events leading up to January 6, they do not offer a complete understanding of Nancy’s role in the decision-making process.
Sund’s testimony, however, has reignited a debate regarding Speaker Nancy’s influence on security decisions for the Capitol.
Sund’s testimony has now lent further credence to this assertion.
Representative Loudermilk has indicated that Paul Irving will be summoned to testify before his subcommittee, presenting an opportunity for additional clarification and a deeper understanding of the decision-making process related to Capitol security on January 6.
This development promises to add more complexity to an already intricate narrative, as questions regarding the events of that day continue to loom large in American politics and public discourse.
-
People2 hours agoHomeless man walked into fast food restaurant and asked what he would get for 50 cents, ‘the boy’s answer was wise beyond his years’!
-
People3 hours agoBaby Keeps Staring Inside His Pants, When Mom Discovers Why She Calls 911
-
People15 hours agoFarmer discovered a secret door in the ground, but ‘what he found on the other side caused the world to lose their breath’!
-
People17 hours agoBear Won’t Let Baby Go And When The Ranger Finds Out Why, He Gasps
-
People5 hours agoOfficer Spots What Mom And Son Are Doing In Parked Car, Swiftly Reacts
-
People14 hours agoIf You Notice This Bug in Your Home, Call Expert Services Immediately! Do Not Try to Handle It on Your Own! Consider How Dangerous It Can Be
-
People23 hours agoWhen doctors delivered his baby, they saw the birth cord and told the father “hurry up dad, take a picture your baby is a miracle”!
-
People12 hours agoWho was this Stranger who allowed a worried 96-year-old woman hold his arm on the plane, carry her bag, and stay with her until she reached her family?